Biostar X470NH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar X470NH  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '22 at 19:23
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83
1-Core 112
2-Core 214
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 560
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 599
37% 599 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 111
Parallax 100
76% 101 fps
MRender 94.1
Gravity 101
Splatting 100
81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 186 210 191 197 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 989
Write 860
Mixed 901
SusWrite 200
165% 738 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 63.2
206% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 375
323% 487 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 140%
Great: 183%
Liteonit LCS-128M6S-HP 128GB
81GB free
Firmware: DC71705
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 284 292 298 298 280 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 441
Write 297
Mixed 264
SusWrite 280
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 35.9
130% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 207
189% 289 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 31.7
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.3
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 26
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470NH Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar X470NH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback