bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive21.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH61HO
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 64.1
2-Core 100
45% 74.2 Pts
4-Core 107
8-Core 133
15% 120 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 58%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
428GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK66A5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 55 22 153 157 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.3% Poor
Read 106
Write 114
Mixed 112
SusWrite 82.3
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 9.8
32% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 61.3
DQ Mixed 32.9
28% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 102%
ADATA NH13 1TB
44GB free, PID a13a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 11 8.1 24 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 16.5
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 15.1
25% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5458-005.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
22.5% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.6
21% 7.33 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback