Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL_X409FL

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL_X409FL (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X409FL
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190430
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 04 '22 at 16:15
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	17%
CPU Throttled	88%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 70.4 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 171 58% 103 Pts	4-Core 295 8-Core 432 45% 363 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 118F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.82% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 3 2% 7.7 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 3.4 Splatting 8.9 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.82% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB 4,206 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 268 308 313 305 297 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 652 Write 868 Mixed 692 SusWrite 325 143% 634 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 84.8 4K Mixed 44.7 155% 54.9 MB/s	DQ Read 533 DQ Write 528 DQ Mixed 579 422% 547 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 189%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 701GB free Firmware: JU0C1J SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 110 128 125 126 124 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 112 Write 145 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 123 79% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Kingston KF424S14IB/4 8GB 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.2% Above average	MC Read 23.3 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 18.3 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 17.5 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL_X409FL Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409FL_X409FL

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	19x
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	13x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	7x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	3x
WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GBWDCBench 45%, 85,321 samples	2x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	2x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBMicronBench 57%, 2,923 samples	3x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 1x4GBMicronBench 33%, 1,799 samples	2x
4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBMicronBench 60%, 525 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16