MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210923
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 09:47
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT-$316
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 80.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 294
94% 175 Pts
4-Core 570
8-Core 914
91% 742 Pts
64-Core 1,422
88% 1,422 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 234
Reflection 221
Parallax 206
190% 220 fps
Gravity 164
Splatting 144
135% 154 fps
Poor: 135% Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$99
131GB free
Firmware: X611
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 367 285 395 394 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 411
Mixed 240
SusWrite 342
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 51.8
175% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 277
219% 304 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 109%
Great: 116%
PNY CS2130 2TB SSD
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS213530
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 344 195 383 285 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,339
Write 2100
Mixed 1,400
SusWrite 399
296% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 72.9
250% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,181
880% 1,170 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 207%
Great: 382%
Seagate BUP SL 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 120 91 134 136 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 76
Write 124
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 114
22% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
5% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 13%
Wl4000gsa6472e 1 4TB
462GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 97 77 99 99 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 110
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 89.3
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 94%
Jmicron Tech 3TB
457GB free
Firmware: 0407
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 105 82 109 109 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 104
Mixed 59
SusWrite 97.3
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56%
Great: 119%
WD My Passport 25F3 512GB
27GB free, PID 25f3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 426
Write 451
Mixed 257
473% 378 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 16.9
1,467% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 19.5
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 17.4
1,851% 23.9 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 339%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 127 98 131 127 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 167
Write 184
Mixed 124
SusWrite 116
198% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 1.5
267% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.9
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 28.2
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 37.8
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 92%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR WIFI (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback