MSI TRX40 PRO 10G (MS-7C60)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 193%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 305%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics224% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive384% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C60
MotherboardMSI TRX40 PRO 10G (MS-7C60)  (all builds)
Memory243.2 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 04 '22 at 02:27
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 3960X-$1,350
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 69.4
1-Core 147
2-Core 296
90% 171 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,120
99% 841 Pts
64-Core 4449
275% 4449 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-Ti
PNY(196E 139C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
224% Outstanding
Lighting 321
Reflection 316
Parallax 351
261% 329 fps
MRender 398
Gravity 317
Splatting 210
242% 309 fps
Poor: 205%
This bench: 224%
Great: 247%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3059 1854 1873 1855 1868 1874 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
384% Outstanding
Read 2,893
Write 3,287
Mixed 3,025
SusWrite 2,064
636% 2,817 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 104
339% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 978
DQ Write 673
DQ Mixed 828
618% 826 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 384%
Great: 488%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
413GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 700 731 618 615 616 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,587
Write 2,368
Mixed 1,616
SusWrite 678
404% 1,812 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 93.6
320% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,090
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 882
676% 923 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 286%
Great: 340%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
223GB free
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 113 114 113 113 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 477
Write 426
Mixed 362
SusWrite 144
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 73
4K Mixed 35.3
133% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 154
122% 168 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 100%
Toshiba THNSNJ512GCSU 512GB
137GB free
Firmware: JURA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 107%
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
79GB free
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 135 134 134 134 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 405
Write 136
Mixed 203
SusWrite 134
48% 220 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 23.8
81% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 132
110% 161 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 77%
WD Game Drive 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3087
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 352 352 353 353 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 349
Write 352
Mixed 342
SusWrite 352
79% 349 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 31.3
101% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 223
169% 227 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GTZN 8x31.9GB
8 of 8 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
158% Outstanding
MC Read 63.9
MC Write 59.7
MC Mixed 67.1
182% 63.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 33.7
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 158%
Great: 202%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRX40 PRO 10G (MS-7C60) Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 179%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 314%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI TRX40 PRO 10G (MS-7C60)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $3,203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback