Today's hottest deals

HP Z640 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z640 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212A
Memory57.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150722
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 09:55
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 71.9
2-Core 147
59% 99.1 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 578
52% 436 Pts
64-Core 1,893
117% 1,893 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 361.91
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
33% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 41.9
Parallax 37.2
32% 39.6 fps
MRender 50.9
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 39.4
34% 42.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 107 131 43 126 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 465
Write 343
Mixed 338
SusWrite 108
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 58.9
4K Mixed 28.4
112% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 194
174% 262 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 90%
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
229GB free
Firmware: BXW73H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1198 1209 1206 1170 1191 1163 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 989
Write 1,218
Mixed 769
SusWrite 1,190
236% 1,041 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 47.1
162% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 499
370% 494 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 184%
Great: 243%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
253GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 51 54 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 46
Write 51.8
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 53.1
35% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 Samsung M393A1G40EB1-CPB Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
MC Read 54.4
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 39.6
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.8
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 84.3
48% 84.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z640 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,643 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z640 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $509
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback