Acer TravelMate P248-MG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.02%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics9.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 41% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer TravelMate P248-MG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer BA40_SL
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 16:10
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%
CPU Throttled 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Memory 10.8
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 20.5
8% 14.3 Pts
4-Core 30.2
8-Core 32.1
4% 31.1 Pts
64-Core 29.6
2% 29.6 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Acer(1025 1046) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1659
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Lighting 13.1
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 11.2
11% 13 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 9.2
8% 9.53 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1240G 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0601B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 179 169 253 277 247 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 375
Write 292
Mixed 298
SusWrite 230
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 20.6
4K Mixed 14.6
56% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 80.2
DQ Write 64.7
DQ Mixed 46
42% 63.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KBGR/4G ACR16D3LS1KNG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.3
22% 7.73 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 396
10% 396 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P248-MG Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P248-MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback