bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 08:43
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU #000, 10 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 144
55% 94 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 541
49% 410 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 429GB
25GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 157 168 191 189 181 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 419
Write 224
Mixed 183
SusWrite 168
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 14.2
50% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 148
113% 153 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 88%
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
15GB free
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 435
Write 317
Mixed 323
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 10.1
33% 9.8 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 143
109% 148 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 77%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 58 47 52 41 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 50.4
MC Write 43.5
MC Mixed 45.3
133% 46.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 15.4
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback