bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181212
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateFeb 25 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU #000, 10 CPU, 10 cores, 10 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 40.5
1-Core 32
2-Core 67.6
28% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 342
27% 241 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 408GB
32GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 149 176 189 183 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 313
Write 243
Mixed 196
SusWrite 165
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 8
30% 8.77 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 144
109% 147 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 100%
Vmware Virtual disk 107GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 101 83 70 66 46 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 85%
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
15GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 53 54 50 57 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 212
Write 72.5
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 52.5
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.6
804% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 52.2
MC Write 43.6
MC Mixed 43.9
133% 46.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback