HP p6631p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics20.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP p6631p  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AB1
Memory15.9 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100721
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 07:47
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 70.5
34% 54 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 163
22% 162 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Lighting 23.4
Reflection 26.7
Parallax 32.6
19% 27.6 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 30
Splatting 26.8
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 256GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 88 78 100 86 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.3% Below average
Read 233
Write 173
Mixed 188
SusWrite 87.8
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 11.7
56% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 24.2
41% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 69%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
93GB free
Firmware: 401120RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 158 165 171 172 196 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.4% Average
Read 217
Write 215
Mixed 210
SusWrite 170
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 22.2
77% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 127
100% 138 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA331 1TB
162GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3NH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 98 100 99 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 85.9
Write 89.5
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 99
59% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 76%
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$190
698GB free
Firmware: JP3OA3BF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 121 126 125 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 131
Write 134
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 123
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
164% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.2
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6631p Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP p6631p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback