Lenovo 2349E51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 2349E51  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 2349E51
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190807
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 19:19
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 76.6
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 174
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 464
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.3 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 358 356 346 358 353 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 439
Mixed 418
SusWrite 353
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 36.3
117% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 296
241% 342 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 130%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 2349E51 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 2349E51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $263
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback