Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 14:48
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 213
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 415
59% 435 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 91.2
Reflection 89.3
Parallax 83.6
74% 88 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 79.3
Splatting 70.4
70% 87.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GMTE110S 256GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1006A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 932 952 920 908 840 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,559
Write 972
Mixed 934
SusWrite 907
244% 1,093 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 32.8
169% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 766
DQ Mixed 350
328% 494 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 193%
Great: 191%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
102GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 72 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 63.2
Write 94
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 69.9
52% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST3500320NS 500GB-$100
173GB free
Firmware: SN05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 92.4
Write 96.4
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 73
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 36.1
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 41.6
SC Mixed 28.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback