Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55-M  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 170
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 395
46% 356 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 1.7
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 234 230 209 227 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65% Good
Read 243
Write 232
Mixed 231
SusWrite 227
53% 233 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 31.8
104% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 197
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65%
Great: 128%
Sandisk 3.2 Gen 1 124GB
106GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 26 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.39% Terrible
Read 33.7
Write 27.9
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 27.5
7% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 4.7
17% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 8.39%
Great: 48%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
30GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 26 28 25 26 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 42.6
Write 15.9
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 26.7
20% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20%
Great: 33%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45
735GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 153 176 163 177 176 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 132
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 169
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback