PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55-M (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | Χρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120904 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Jun 28 '22 at 20:21 |
Run Duration | 173 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 20% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
2.55%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 209 233 225 226 229 MB/s
|
62.9%
Good
|
|||
Sandisk 3.2 Gen 1 124GB
106GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 28 27 27 28 MB/s
|
8.31%
Terrible
|
|||
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
32GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 28 27 28 28 MB/s
|
19.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
775GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 151 173 171 173 174 MB/s
|
97.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
44.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples | 65x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 52x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples | 15x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 70% - Very good | Total price: $100 |