Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55-M  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 20:21
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 174
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 355
41% 320 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 267 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 1.7
3% 2.63 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 209 233 225 226 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.9% Good
Read 243
Write 234
Mixed 227
SusWrite 226
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 28.6
98% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 128%
Sandisk 3.2 Gen 1 124GB
106GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 25 28 27 27 28 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.31% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 28.1
Mixed 29
SusWrite 27.2
7% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 4.7
17% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 48%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
32GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 24 28 27 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 42
Write 27.4
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 26.7
23% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 33%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
775GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 151 173 171 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 131
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 168
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback