Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER C15B
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 20:43
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4712MQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 85.3
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 175
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 88.5
8-Core 260
19% 174 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Device(1B0A 20FA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 98 67 78 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 442
Write 365
Mixed 256
SusWrite 106
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 16
73% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 32.2
39% 70.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 106 106 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 102
64% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BF160BJ.C8F Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 12.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,358 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback