Asus G74Sx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 22 months ago.
SystemAsus G74Sx  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G74Sx
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 08:23
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 137
60% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 234
8-Core 370
37% 302 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 560M
Asus(1043 204A) 3GB
CLim: 775 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
7.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 7.8
7% 9.6 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 10
Splatting 9.2
8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.59%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 246 405 391 384 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45% Average
Read 456
Write 394
Mixed 382
SusWrite 249
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 17.4
4K Mixed 0.8
40% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 4.2
DQ Write 37.3
DQ Mixed 0.6
6% 14 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45%
Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB-$105
558GB free
Firmware: X411
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 302 313 304 302 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 438
Write 378
Mixed 262
SusWrite 307
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 23
74% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 233
198% 290 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F M471B5273DH0-CH9 859B CT51264BF160B.C16F 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G74Sx Builds (Compare 474 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G74Sx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $300
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback