Gigabyte GA-Z590 UD AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 185%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 176%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics189% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
22 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z590 UD AC  (all builds)
Memory55.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 07:09
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11600K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 313
102% 188 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 956
93% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Device(1B4C 1539) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
189% Outstanding
Lighting 271
Reflection 258
Parallax 285
221% 271 fps
MRender 322
Gravity 231
Splatting 175
191% 243 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 189%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$87
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2871
Write 2,699
Mixed 2,622
610% 2,731 MB/s
4K Read 76
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 72.3
252% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,349
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 358
366% 631 MB/s
Poor: 206% Great: 442%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
191GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1470 1278 1261 1251 1207 867 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 1,970
Mixed 1,478
SusWrite 1,222
402% 1,799 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 64.8
217% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,396
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 266
319% 596 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 277%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
93GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 123 126 113 141 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 101
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 120
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
16GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 66 69 72 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 62.6
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 66.8
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 69%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB
9GB free, PID 61b5
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 67 64 65 71 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 64
Write 55.2
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 64.9
77% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL32G32C16U4RL.M16FB 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 27.8
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 33.1
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 65.1
61% 65.1 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 144 23.8" 1280 720 VSC0D39 XG2405
Typical GA-Z590 UD AC Builds (Compare 6,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 UD AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback