MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 95% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 00:32
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 95%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 206
2-Core 395
118% 226 Pts
4-Core 742
8-Core 1,367
126% 1,054 Pts
64-Core 2,324
144% 2,324 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2527 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 151
Parallax 138
113% 142 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 143
Splatting 124
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 121 61 2.8 4.4 2.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 476
Write 406
Mixed 401
SusWrite 95
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 27.8
122% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 50.4
99% 196 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 92%
WDC WD60EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 107 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 119
Write 108
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 106
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1
14% 5.53 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 12
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 4.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 39%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
255GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 473 462 479 479 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 472
Mixed 447
SusWrite 474
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 50.8
169% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 334
251% 337 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 117%
Great: 133%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
845GB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 81 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 74.5
Write 68
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 80.4
96% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
156% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 63%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 116 114 114 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 121
Write 107
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 115
139% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.7
245% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 25.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 18.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 11,225 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4 - $117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback