Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory16 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160226
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 29 '22 at 13:17
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 195
70% 124 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 319
42% 316 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 55.6
Reflection 56.5
Parallax 49.2
45% 53.8 fps
MRender 42.4
Gravity 50.6
Splatting 45.9
38% 46.3 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 233010WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 457 605 362 329 335 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 652
Write 593
Mixed 607
SusWrite 403
127% 563 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
199% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 911
636% 796 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 145%
Great: 276%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 219 171 165 160 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 435
Mixed 363
SusWrite 180
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 98.8
4K Mixed 57
190% 66.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 105%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
46GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 137 136 137 138 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 108
Write 97.8
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 136
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 109%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
310GB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 149 147 148 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 161
Write 164
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 148
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
300% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 104%
PHILIPS 126GB
92GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 0.1 3.6 3.6 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.08% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 14.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 3.7
12% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0
18% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.08%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,935 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $567
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback