Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181227
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 144
2-Core 268
94% 168 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 962
92% 758 Pts
64-Core 1,507
93% 1,507 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Gigabyte(1458 407B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 119
Parallax 119
97% 119 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 102
Splatting 97
86% 106 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 1175 1140 1197 1169 1132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 907
Write 2,147
Mixed 981
SusWrite 1,203
298% 1,310 MB/s
4K Read 53.6
4K Write 92.3
4K Mixed 65.2
214% 70.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,115
DQ Write 690
DQ Mixed 873
658% 893 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 216%
Great: 372%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
591GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 93 113 227 230 230 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 433
Write 335
Mixed 284
SusWrite 170
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 11.8
36% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 58%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 181 182 181 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 140
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 180
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
ST375064 0A 750GB
69GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 29.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 33.4
40% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 32GB
3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 37
MC Mixed 27.6
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 27.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 62.3
64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,478 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback