Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 18:30
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 50
2-Core 103
48% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 199
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 2GB
CLim: 1026 MHz, MLim: 540 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 9.5
7% 7.93 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 63 60 64 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 201
Write 186
Mixed 152
SusWrite 61.8
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 33.4
110% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 41.8
34% 47.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
23GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 64 60 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 72
Write 78.1
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 62.4
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 60%
Generic External 750GB
167GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 22.2
Write 22.1
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 23.7
29% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.8% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 10
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $35SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback