Asus M4A79XTD EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A79XTD EVO  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 18:18
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 102
49% 76.8 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 196
12% 196 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gigabyte(1458 36E5) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.57% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 8.4
6% 6.87 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 61 63 63 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 185
Write 190
Mixed 142
SusWrite 61
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 33.5
110% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 33.4
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 42.4
35% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
23GB free
Firmware: CA12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 61 64 63 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 70
Write 78.2
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 61.5
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 60%
Generic External 750GB
167GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 23.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 23.6
30% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 12.7
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 9.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A79XTD EVO Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A79XTD EVO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $111
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback