Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 10:59
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 954
94% 770 Pts
64-Core 1,169
72% 1,169 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 87E1) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13014.8
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 22
Parallax 29.9
17% 24.4 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 22.9
Splatting 21.7
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HX256GSSDSATA3 256GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R0248
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 43 39 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
172GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 103 102 103 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 110
Write 98.3
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 102
67% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 60%
Samsung HD253GJ 250GB
93GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 118
Write 55.7
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 84.8
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FE 16GB
3533, 3533 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 36.2
99% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 47.3
SC Mixed 28.6
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $66

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback