Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$60 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 87.7 2-Core 166 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 224 30% 225 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.07% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.7 Parallax 6.7 6% 7.83 fps	MRender 9.7 Gravity 8 Splatting 7.1 7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.07% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-128M6S 128GB 1,777 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: DC72205 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 247 Write 229 Mixed 205 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 29.7 4K Mixed 20.4 69% 22.7 MB/s	DQ Read 188 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 131 111% 162 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 94%
Hfs128g3 9TND-N210A 128GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2GB free Firmware: 0204 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 33.3 Write 26.6 Mixed 28 6% 29.3 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.4 25% 7.6 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 71%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 438GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 122 Write 118 Mixed 68.5 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM1333KLN-4G Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325