Acer Veriton M6610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M6610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 155
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 261
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 22.8
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 163 73 37 81 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 441
Write 213
Mixed 310
SusWrite 71.3
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 22.6
85% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 147
145% 227 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-4GB-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.7
26% 9.23 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M6610 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback