Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W280  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 16:55
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 84%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
65.3% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 127
58% 92.9 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 322
34% 274 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 42
30% 40 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 27.2
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0200Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 8.7 38 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.4% Below average
Read 231
Write 74.6
Mixed 126
SusWrite 13.8
24% 111 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 17
70% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 57.1
71% 127 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 79%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
412GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 101 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 102
Write 46.8
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 99.4
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5273DH0-CK0 80CE M378B5273DH0-CK0 802C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 802C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback