Acer Veriton M6610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Veriton M6610  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M6610
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 11:41
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 136
57% 94 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 229
28% 215 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.5
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 22.9
18% 20.9 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 16.8
17% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 3.7 6.4 7.5 8.1 8.5 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 198
Write 176
Mixed 130
SusWrite 6.9
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 6.3
8% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 86%
52netbar iShareDisk 188GB
41GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 34 43 62 40 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 36.3
Write 29.7
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 46.6
31% 40.9 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 7.3
1,157% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-4GB-1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
28.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M6610 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M6610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback