Gigabyte GA-MZ72-HB0-00

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MZ72-HB0-00  (all builds)
Memory122.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 21:13
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: AMD EPYC 7702 64-Core
P0, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 880
78% 661 Pts
64-Core 4,075
252% 4,075 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 112 106 103 117 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 460
Write 375
Mixed 123
SusWrite 117
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 15.4
67% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 50.6
DQ Mixed 12.7
28% 58.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 56%
Intel SSDPECKE064T8 3TB
6TB free
Firmware: VDV10160
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2354 2229 2250 2288 2315 2322 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
278% Outstanding
Read 1139
Write 2,211
Mixed 1,241
SusWrite 2,293
392% 1,721 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 43.7
183% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 1,000
DQ Mixed 852
642% 845 MB/s
Poor: 129%
This bench: 278%
Great: 278%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF8G72PZ-3G2B2 2x31.5GB
2 of 16 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
56.8% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 22.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MZ72-HB0-00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MZ72-HB0-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback