Gigabyte GA-M720-US3

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-M720-US3 (all builds)
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090108
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 17 '17 at 13:56
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+ 4,133 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	31% Below average	Memory 53.4 1-Core 29.5 2-Core 37.8 29% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 52 8-Core 51 7% 51.5 Pts	64-Core 54.1 3% 54.1 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6500 122 User benchmarks, average bench 0% XFX(1682 2153) 64MB Ram: 64MB, Driver: 309.8 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.12 Parallax 0.09 0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3FD6SD Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.1% Poor	Read 201 Write 104 Mixed 98.3 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 17.8 4K Mixed 7.24 43% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 18 DQ Write 37.9 DQ Mixed 7.03 11% 21 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 622GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 103 Write 107 Mixed 97.8 77% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.83 4K Mixed 0.2 66% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 114%
Maxtor 6V250F0 250GB 115 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 211GB free Firmware: VA111680 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 64.7 Write 66.5 Mixed 53.9 46% 61.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.29 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 2048, 1024, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 3 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 148 27% 148 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-M720-US3 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 27%

Raft

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-M720-US3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	5x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	4x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
GeForce 9800 GTNvidiaBench 5%, 19,550 samples	2x
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH 120GBWDCBench 39%, 6 samples	3x
Burst 480GBPatriotBench 76%, 16,899 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	17x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $311

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16