Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H81M-S1  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3260
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 179
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 181
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 174
11% 174 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
mSATA-I50 64GB
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 146 154 144 138 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 377
Write 136
Mixed 164
SusWrite 144
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 40.2
145% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 102
104% 172 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 32GB
24GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 6.2 11 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
9.97% Terrible
Read 43.4
Write 24.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 12.2
22% 20.4 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 2.1
86% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.97%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BD160B.C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 9.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H81M-S1 Builds (Compare 1,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H81M-S1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $237
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback