Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi innovation and technology(shenzhen)co.,ltd HeroBook Air (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20220528
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '22 at 12:32
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020C 108 User benchmarks, average bench 19% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Memory 19.4 1-Core 24.1 2-Core 57.5 18% 33.7 Pts	4-Core 50 8-Core 70.9 8% 60.5 Pts	64-Core 88.8 6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9684 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.53% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 0.7 1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.53% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/128GYN 128GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 118 167 193 163 143 MB/s Performing below potential (39^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.3% Average	Read 266 Write 169 Mixed 196 SusWrite 167 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 49.8 4K Mixed 14.8 74% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 1.3 34% 83.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x1GB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.63 GB/s	SC Read 1.7 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 0.8 5% 1.83 GB/s	Latency 325 12% 325 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 23%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020CIntelBench 19%, 108 samples	9x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	9x

SSD
S535N8/128GYN 128GBNetacBench 51%, 35 samples	5x
128GB 128GBNetacBench 58%, 1,666 samples	4x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x1GBABCDBench 18%, 2,355 samples	9x