Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '22 at 02:43
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 155
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 268
35% 266 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.01
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 7
4% 6.47 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 9
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/128GYN 128GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 275 273 280 286 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 434
Write 275
Mixed 304
SusWrite 254
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 21.1
92% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 34.5
60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
46.5% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.1
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,724 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback