HP Laptop 15s-fq4xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq4xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 89BC
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 03:08
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i5-1155G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 154
2-Core 298
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 493
8-Core 649
73% 571 Pts
64-Core 664
41% 664 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 89BC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1029
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 26.5
Parallax 25.7
16% 23.8 fps
MRender 20.1
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 17.1
18% 22.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SK hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1350 1138 614 662 643 658 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2,158
Write 1,821
Mixed 1,463
SusWrite 844
351% 1,572 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 139
4K Mixed 80.3
266% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 401
DQ Mixed 754
526% 672 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 249%
Great: 299%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
6GB free, PID a209
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.4 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Read 20.3
Write 8.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9.4
13% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 8%
WD My Passport 071A 500GB
297GB free, PID 071a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 26
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 34
39% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.C8FP CT8G4SFS832A.C8FN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 40.8
MC Mixed 32.3
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 43.2
SC Mixed 20.9
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 1 1 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD06E8
Typical Laptop 15s-fq4xxx Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq4xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback