Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 00:13
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$90
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 162
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 281
38% 286 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3525) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.33% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.53 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.1
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.33%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 120GB 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0330A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 43 11 7.5 9.8 18 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.3% Very poor
Read 147
Write 146
Mixed 6.3
SusWrite 17.2
18% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.2
16% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
134GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 95 92 92 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 92.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 92.5
62% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CF8 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CF8 44GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 12
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF Brazil PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback