Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)  (all builds)
MotherboardCASPER F15KR 001
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 17:10
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 53%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 91.9
2-Core 197
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 409
47% 366 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1B0A 233C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
6.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 7.6
6% 8.73 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 10.9
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.11%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA12.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 99 97 95 190 101 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62% Good
Read 157
Write 83.6
Mixed 142
SusWrite 128
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 33.7
123% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 194
155% 213 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 62%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF Kingston 9905711-038.A00G 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.9
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL) Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NB F650 GOLD(F650.8250-4T45T-G TURKCELL)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback