Gigabyte GA-Q1532N

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q1532N  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110620
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 16:49
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 73
1-Core 62
2-Core 116
52% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 180
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Clevo(1558 2500) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 129 120 132 122 133 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 420
Write 424
Mixed 314
SusWrite 162
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 33.2
112% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 311
245% 339 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 130 131 132 129 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 93
Write 82.7
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 128
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1333KSN-4G Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 15.5
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q1532N Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q1532N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback