ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G751JY

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Asus G751JY (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G751JY
Memory	29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '22 at 13:05
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4860HQ 1,015 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 79 1-Core 98.9 2-Core 198 71% 125 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 491 55% 433 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M 14,160 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 22DA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	33.3% Below average	Lighting 39.3 Reflection 57.9 Parallax 44.4 32% 47.2 fps	MRender 36.9 Gravity 44.4 Splatting 47.3 36% 42.9 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$68 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 431GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 350 339 345 331 367 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 440 Mixed 426 SusWrite 341 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 57.1 188% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 324 243% 326 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 130%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 931GB free Firmware: JB0OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 121 122 122 123 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 125 Write 108 Mixed 24.8 SusWrite 121 68% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Goodram GR1600S3V64L11/8G 4x8GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	MC Read 38.2 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 21 77% 26.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 19.9 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 82.5 48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G751JY Builds (Compare 583 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation

Workstation 23%

Surfboard

System: Asus G751JY

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	241x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	206x
Core i7-4860HQIntelBench 69%, 1,015 samples	55x

GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples	352x
GeForce GTX 980MNvidiaBench 39%, 10,379 samples	230x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	1x

SSD
XP941 PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 133%, 1,434 samples	126x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $223Bench 175%, 7,621 samples	38x
X300s Non-Secure 128GBSanDiskBench 75%, 1,499 samples	36x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	94x
HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 51%, 18,309 samples	68x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback