Asus H81M-V PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-V PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '22 at 04:40
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 202
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 408
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 411
25% 411 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.8.1
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 28.4
Parallax 32.7
18% 27.6 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 22.3
21% 25.6 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 25%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.4 5.4 9.5 7.2 28 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18% Very poor
Read 46.7
Write 55.2
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 15.6
30% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 18%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1201 AE34G1609U2 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 13.9
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-V PLUS Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H81M-V PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $694
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback