Biostar H310MHC2

Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHC2 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '22 at 01:19
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 92.4 1-Core 125 2-Core 249 87% 156 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 726 76% 607 Pts	64-Core 725 45% 725 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 130 Parallax 126 103% 127 fps	MRender 141 Gravity 98 Splatting 95.3 89% 111 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 86 84 90 82 80 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 464 Write 297 Mixed 284 SusWrite 91.8 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 65.9 4K Mixed 38.4 98% 37.7 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 61.1 DQ Mixed 94.1 72% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 100%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54 11,103 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 611GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 6.6 6.5 6.7 6.9 5.9 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	71.9% Very good	Read 490 Write 402 Mixed 381 SusWrite 38.2 73% 328 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 88.1 4K Mixed 26.7 125% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 36.3 96% 199 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYA4U2666D19081C 2x8GB 538 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	87.5% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 23.7 89% 31.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.2 SC Write 36.7 SC Mixed 25.1 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 63.3 63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.5% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHC2 Builds (Compare 188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHC2

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	61x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	32x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	13x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
T253X1240G 240GBTeamBench 68%, 3,895 samples	9x

RAM
CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 2,264 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	6x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16