Biostar H310MHC2

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	56.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H310MHC2 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190322
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 22 '22 at 01:16
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.1 1-Core 125 2-Core 250 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 712 75% 603 Pts	64-Core 704 44% 704 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$296 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8732) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 135 Parallax 121 107% 129 fps	MRender 143 Gravity 106 Splatting 102 94% 117 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 43 42 32 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Read 440 Write 46.9 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 39.7 31% 145 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 42.9 4K Mixed 27 105% 33.8 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 44.5 DQ Mixed 41.9 44% 74 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 100%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54 11,103 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 772GB free Firmware: M6CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.7 6.2 371 285 6.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Read 505 Write 394 Mixed 381 SusWrite 114 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.4 27% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TYA4U2666D19081C 2x8GB 538 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 23.8 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 37 SC Mixed 25 76% 26.5 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310MHC2 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHC2

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	61x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	31x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	27x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	24x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	13x

SSD
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
T253X1240G 240GBTeamBench 68%, 3,895 samples	9x

RAM
CL19-19-19 D4-2666 1x8GBUnknownBench 44%, 2,264 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	6x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 115% - Outstanding

Total price: $157

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16