Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 22:12
Run Duration303 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 285
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 569
8-Core 974
94% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,562
97% 1,562 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2660) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 27.2
17% 26.2 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 24.1
23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30013 1TB
509GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1721 1686 1427 1551 1544 1311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,862
Write 2,271
Mixed 2,073
SusWrite 1,540
438% 1,936 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 72.2
222% 75 MB/s
DQ Read 646
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 526
388% 517 MB/s
Poor: 236%
This bench: 261%
Great: 508%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
23GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 404 425 403 409 429 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 182
Mixed 437
SusWrite 408
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 45.9
146% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 294
238% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
77GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 471 470 476 478 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 466
Mixed 358
SusWrite 474
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 76.5
4K Mixed 39.9
140% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 168
175% 289 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
SSK Storage 250GB
46GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 579 439 436 437 418 218 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 85%
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
91GB free
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 100 82 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 414
Write 234
Mixed 172
SusWrite 113
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 18.3
74% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 42
47% 79.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 53%
Seagate Backup+ BL 1TB
208GB free, PID a013
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 60 60 61 61 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 77.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 59.3
80% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 44%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
14GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 71 70 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 61.7
Write 96.2
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 70.6
110% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 45%
Seagate FreeAgent XTreme 640GB
166GB free, PID 3101
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.1 8.1 8.2 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.91% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 18.7
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 8.1
24% 17 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.91%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 8502 3600 C17 Series 029E CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 28.9
97% 34.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 43.9
SC Mixed 27.9
90% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 15,405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO WIFI - $297

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $924
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback