TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Plexhd X79 Turbo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardPlexhd X79 Turbo  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 14:27
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 155
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 456
48% 383 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 69.8%
 Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR041
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 411 407 420 328 437 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 461
Write 284
Mixed 376
SusWrite 402
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 16.1
73% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 27.7
78% 160 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 74.8%
 Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- M393B1K70QB0- 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 23.3
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 19.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 11
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 51.9%
 Great: 59%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X79 Turbo Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Plexhd X79 Turbo

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples9x
Xeon E5-2667 v2IntelBench 75%, 1,324 samples3x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel  $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples2x
GPU
RTX 3050Nvidia  $250Bench 75%, 43,922 samples3x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples3x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples2x
SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples2x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples2x
JAJPR600512GB 512GBBench 236%, 11 samples2x
RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples12x
HMT42GR7BFR4A 4x16GBHynixBench 80%, 25 samples1x
36KSF1G72PZ-1 1x8GBMicronBench 27%, 14 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback