Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '17 at 00:38
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 137
2-Core 262
93% 165 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 702
70% 571 Pts
64-Core 744
46% 744 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 200
Parallax 192
144% 189 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 173
Splatting 126
116% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1,392
Mixed 1,452
312% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 66.8
238% 88.3 MB/s
DQ Read 592
DQ Write 390
DQ Mixed 238
246% 407 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 234%
Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
77GB free
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 527
Write 502
Mixed 512
115% 514 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 47.1
170% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 164
172% 283 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Samsung 830 256GB-$261
67GB free
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 512
Write 358
Mixed 401
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 22
99% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 92
DQ Mixed 67.4
82% 149 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 86%
WD WD2003FZEX-00Z4SA0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01M02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 165
Mixed 159
126% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.73
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 38.4
MC Write 40.3
MC Mixed 33.4
107% 37.4 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 42.1
SC Mixed 32.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 48.7
82% 48.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 106%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,683 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $762
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback