Asus EX-H510M-V3

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

22 months ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus EX-H510M-V3 (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220507
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '22 at 21:35
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	64.3% Good	Memory 75.7 1-Core 107 2-Core 235 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 564 50% 425 Pts	64-Core 595 37% 595 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F0) CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.4% Average	Lighting 57.7 Reflection 60.1 Parallax 81.8 47% 66.5 fps	MRender 60.5 Gravity 65.6 Splatting 44.3 45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 339GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 463 477 404 359 361 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 444 Mixed 423 SusWrite 411 98% 436 MB/s	4K Read 37.7 4K Write 84.5 4K Mixed 48.6 164% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 349 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 129%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 24GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 103 94 99 93 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	53% Above average	Read 85 Write 94.6 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 99.1 63% 85.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Apacer GD2.1827CC.001 1x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.3 31% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 5 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EX-H510M-V3 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-H510M-V3

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $126Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	33x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	31x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	25x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	12x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	19x
S800 240GBRamstaBench 57%, 1,330 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	8x

RAM
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples	11x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 79%, 1,076 samples	9x
KF2666C16D4/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 41%, 1,678 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16