Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q910

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO Q910  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3183-A1
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 19:22
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 105
51% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 156
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 161
10% 161 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.45% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.45%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Solid 256GB
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1211A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 395
Mixed 356
90% 407 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 20.5
101% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 31.2
80% 160 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G4M1 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO Q910 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO Q910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $130
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback