MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive260% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211012
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 17:48
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 158
2-Core 281
90% 169 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 650
66% 537 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.6
4% 13.6 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.8
6% 6.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 966 1028 867 951 1034 948 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,664
Write 1,075
Mixed 920
SusWrite 966
258% 1,156 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 214
4K Mixed 90.7
335% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 614
DQ Write 812
DQ Mixed 263
324% 563 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 260%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 14.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,047 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback