Emachines E627

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemEmachines E627  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines eMachines E627
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 03:58
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Turion 64 X2 Mobile Technology TL-60-$28
Socket S1G1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 57.8
34% 50 Pts
4-Core 57.2
8-Core 58.5
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 58.7
4% 58.7 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3200
Acer(1025 028D) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.8
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.4
0% 0.5 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 88 65 87 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 190
Write 92.5
Mixed 121
SusWrite 79.9
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 10.9
59% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 90.7
DQ Mixed 28.5
42% 78.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMP125S6EFR8C-S6 HYMP125S64CP8-S6 4GB
333, 333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6
16% 5.57 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 5
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E627 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines E627

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 3% - Terrible Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback