Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 22 months ago, 22 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory	21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '22 at 23:11
Run Duration	231 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 69.1 1-Core 97.4 2-Core 155 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 372 8-Core 564 58% 468 Pts	64-Core 562 35% 562 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	43.5% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 51.4 46% 56.7 fps	MRender 42 Gravity 51.2 Splatting 49.7 39% 47.6 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 46%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Lighting 18.5 Reflection 13.7 Parallax 25.3 15% 19.2 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 19.2 Splatting 14 12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB 29,713 User benchmarks, average bench 149% 134GB free (System drive) Firmware: P1MA0V4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 900 951 604 511 397 464 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	149% Outstanding	Read 1,013 Write 978 Mixed 945 SusWrite 638 201% 893 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 61.7 4K Mixed 44.5 144% 47.5 MB/s	DQ Read 464 DQ Write 618 DQ Mixed 631 451% 571 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 181%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$105 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 339GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 422 426 394 388 384 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 433 Mixed 422 SusWrite 403 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 79.4 4K Mixed 50.7 167% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 264 198% 264 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 137%
Samsung SSD 870 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 1.5TB free, PID 1068 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 318 330 292 281 271 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 241 Write 229 Mixed 234 SusWrite 302 348% 252 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.3 161% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 203%
LEXAR JD FIREFLY 1GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID a575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 1.7 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 2.2 5% 4.58 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 5%
WD Game Drive 4TB 3,751 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID 262f Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 30 29 31 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 32.2 Write 30.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 30.4 40% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.7 228% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4S24AM.M16FJ 2x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 27.1 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.9 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 22.9 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	1,844x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	984x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,365x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	951x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	511x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	1,162x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	408x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	380x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	592x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	377x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	137x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16