LG *MS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 20%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemLG *MS  (all builds)
MotherboardMICRO-STAR MS-7541
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '22 at 14:46
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E7500-$109
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 42.4
2-Core 89.7
45% 69 Pts
4-Core 83.4
8-Core 90.9
12% 87.2 Pts
64-Core 91.7
6% 91.7 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Device(1854 803A) 783MB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.42% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.57 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.42%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 112 83 42 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 90.4
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 62%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
29GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.4
Mixed 8.6
14% 15 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B2873FHS-CF8 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.6
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical *MS Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: LG *MS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback