Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100609
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '22 at 08:18
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3460 780 User benchmarks, average bench 68% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 84.1 1-Core 70.8 2-Core 127 58% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 262 30% 236 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 400E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.8% Below average	Lighting 53.8 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 30 44% 46.2 fps	MRender 42.4 Gravity 48.6 Splatting 30 32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2200SC6A SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 157 116 124 122 121 MB/s Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.3% Average	Read 221 Write 217 Mixed 210 SusWrite 140 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 13.9 4K Write 28 4K Mixed 19.7 61% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 195 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 168 134% 186 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 111%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50 10,446 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 61GB free Firmware: AX002J SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 86 86 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	41.2% Average	Read 58.1 Write 64 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 85.5 43% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 98% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 54%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 79GB free Firmware: CR100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 49 49 49 49 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	31% Below average	Read 59 Write 79.4 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 48.9 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:09 0D 99P5471-041.A00LF ID:09 0D 99P5471-041.A00LF 52GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 8192, 8192, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 10.2 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 73.3 55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	285x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	65x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	56x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5773CH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 619 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	13x
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 44GBUnknownBench 30%, 232 samples	13x

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $98

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16